In-Depth Analysis· Annan Plan 2004 referendum results Cyprus explained

The Annan Plan Referendum of 2004: What Happened and Why It Still Matters

The 2004 Annan Plan referendum: Turkish Cypriots voted 64.91% yes, Greek Cypriots 75.83% no. See the plan's terms, each side's case and why it still matters.

By Political Ledger Editorial Team

Published: October 26, 2026

⏱ 10 min read (2,171 words)

Executive Summary & Key Facts

On 24 April 2004, Turkish Cypriots approved the UN's Annan Plan with 64.91% of the vote, while Greek Cypriots rejected it with 75.83%; because each community had to approve separately, the plan failed.
One week later, on 1 May 2004, the Greek Cypriot administration joined the European Union as the sole representative of the island, while EU law was suspended in the north under Protocol No. 10.
The UN Secretary-General's May 2004 report and the EU's 26 April 2004 conclusions both acknowledged the Turkish Cypriot vote and called for ending the isolation of Turkish Cypriots, but the EU's Direct Trade Regulation was never adopted.
Federal talks failed again at Crans-Montana in July 2017, which Ankara and the TRNC cite as evidence that the federal model is exhausted.
The UN Security Council and the EU still frame a settlement as a bizonal, bicommunal federation, while Türkiye and the TRNC leadership argue for a settlement based on sovereign equality and equal international status.

Why It Matters

On 24 April 2004, Cypriots voted in two separate, simultaneous referendums on the UN's Annan Plan for reunification: Turkish Cypriots approved it with 64.91% and Greek Cypriots rejected it with 75.83%. Because both communities had to say yes for the plan to enter into force, it failed. A week later, on 1 May 2004, the Greek Cypriot administration joined the EU while the Turkish Cypriots stayed outside the application of EU law. That sequence still shapes the argument over whether a federal settlement is realistic or whether a different model is needed.

Background

From 1960 to the Annan process

The Republic of Cyprus was established in 1960 under the Zurich and London Agreements of 1959 as a partnership state between the Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot communities, with Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom as guarantor powers under the Treaty of Guarantee. The constitutional partnership broke down in December 1963 amid intercommunal violence. After the 15 July 1974 coup in Cyprus and Türkiye's intervention on 20 July 1974, the island has been effectively divided, with UN peacekeepers deployed along a buffer zone. The Turkish Cypriots proclaimed the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) on 15 November 1983. The UN Security Council, in Resolutions 541 (1983) and 550 (1984), declared that proclamation legally invalid and called on states not to recognize it.

Since the 1977 and 1979 High-Level Agreements, the UN framework has aimed at a bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality. Secretary-General Kofi Annan presented the first version of his plan in November 2002. Talks at The Hague in March 2003 ended without agreement. After a new round on 13 February 2004 in New York, with Greece and Türkiye present, the parties agreed on a fixed process: negotiations on Cyprus, then talks in Bürgenstock, Switzerland, and, if no agreement was reached, the Secretary-General would finalize the text. The final version (often called Annan V) was released on 31 March 2004.

What the plan provided

A United Cyprus Republic: a federal state with a single sovereignty and international personality, made up of a Greek Cypriot State and a Turkish Cypriot State.
Federal institutions: a Presidential Council, a rotating presidency and vice presidency, an equally divided Senate (24–24 seats) and a Chamber of Deputies in which Turkish Cypriots would hold at least 25% of seats.
Territory: the area under Turkish Cypriot administration would shrink from roughly 36% of the island to about 28.5%, including the return of areas such as Güzelyurt/Morphou and Varosha/Maraş.
Property: a mix of restitution, exchange and compensation, with limits on the share of property that could be returned.
Security: demilitarization over time, with limited, phased Greek and Turkish contingents; the Treaties of Guarantee and Alliance were to remain in force.
EU membership: the plan was designed so that a reunited island would join the EU as a whole on 1 May 2004, with transitional arrangements.

The vote and its aftermath

Community	Yes	No
Turkish Cypriots	64.91%	35.09%
Greek Cypriots	24.17%	75.83%

With the plan rejected by one community, the Foundation Agreement never took effect. On 1 May 2004, the Republic of Cyprus, represented only by the Greek Cypriot administration, acceded to the EU. Under Protocol No. 10 to the Act of Accession, the EU acquis was suspended in the areas of the island where the government does not exercise effective control. The EU adopted the Green Line Regulation in 2004 to govern crossing of goods and people, and Aid Regulation 389/2006 provided €259 million for the Turkish Cypriot community. A proposed Direct Trade Regulation, intended to allow trade with the north, was never adopted.

Later attempts

Formal negotiations resumed in 2008 under Mehmet Ali Talat and Dimitris Christofias, and again in 2015–2017 under Mustafa Akıncı and Nicos Anastasiades. The Conference on Cyprus at Crans-Montana, Switzerland, convened by UN Secretary-General António Guterres from 28 June to 7 July 2017 with the three guarantor powers and the EU as observer, ended without agreement. The sticking points were security and guarantees, the presence of troops, and the effective participation and rotation of the presidency. An informal five-party-plus-UN meeting in Geneva (27–29 April 2021) also ended without common ground for formal negotiations. On 15 October 2024, Guterres hosted an informal meeting in New York with the two leaders; Ankara and the TRNC say it again showed no basis for a federal model. In October 2025, Tufan Erhürman was elected TRNC president, and the question of how to restart talks remains open.

Key Players & Positions

United Nations

The Secretary-General's report of 28 May 2004 (S/2004/437) regretted the outcome and acknowledged that the Turkish Cypriot vote expressed a will for a settlement and a place in the EU's future. It urged states to help remove unnecessary restrictions that isolate Turkish Cypriots and impede their development. The UN's formal position nonetheless remains that a settlement should be a bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality, as set out in successive Security Council resolutions.

European Union

The EU General Affairs Council, in its conclusions of 26 April 2004, expressed regret at the outcome, said it was determined to put an end to the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community, and committed to supporting its economic development. The EU continues to support a comprehensive settlement within the UN framework, in line with EU principles and the acquis.

The Greek Cypriot leadership

President Tassos Papadopoulos, in a televised address on 7 April 2004, urged voters to reject the plan. The Greek Cypriot government argued that the plan did not guarantee a functional, reunified state, kept Turkish troops and guarantee rights in place, restricted the return of refugees and property rights, and set the terms through an arbitration process rather than through agreement of the two sides. Greek Cypriot leaders since then have maintained that a federal settlement is possible only if the guarantee system and Turkish troop presence are ended.

Greece

Athens took part in the Bürgenstock process and deferred to the decision of the Greek Cypriot electorate. It has since supported UN-led talks on a federal basis and, like the Greek Cypriot side, opposes a two-state outcome.

Turkish Cypriot leadership

Then TRNC leader Rauf Denktaş opposed the plan, while the government of Prime Minister Mehmet Ali Talat campaigned for a yes vote. In later years, the TRNC leadership under Ersin Tatar (2020–2025) advocated a settlement between two sovereign states, whereas the leadership that took office in 2025 under Erhürman has emphasized the need to restart negotiations.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources · Treaty Texts

Türkiye's Position on the Record

Ankara's stated positions, drawn from the Turkish Foreign Ministry's published Cyprus materials and from the Presidency's addresses, can be summarized as follows.

The 2004 vote shows Turkish Cypriot willingness to settle. Ankara argues that the 64.91% yes vote, backed by the Turkish government of the time, proved that Turkish Cypriots accepted a compromise that included territorial concessions and a federal structure. According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry, the Greek Cypriot rejection by 75.83% showed that the Greek Cypriot side was not prepared to share power on the basis of equality.
Rejection carried no consequences. Ankara argues that the Greek Cypriot administration was admitted to the EU on 1 May 2004 without a settlement, and that the EU's pledges to end Turkish Cypriot isolation were not honored; the Direct Trade Regulation was never adopted. In Ankara's view, this removed any incentive for Greek Cypriots to compromise.
Legal basis in the 1960 treaties. Ankara holds that the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee binds Cyprus not to participate in any political or economic union with any other state (Article I), and that the Greek Cypriot administration's EU accession, without the Turkish Cypriot partner and without Türkiye's and Greece's consent, did not conform to this. Türkiye also maintains its rights as a guarantor under Article IV of the Treaty. Ankara further argues that UN Security Council Resolution 186 (4 March 1964), by treating the Greek Cypriot administration as the government of Cyprus after the 1963 breakdown, created a structural status asymmetry that has hindered a settlement.
The federal model is exhausted. Ankara cites 2004, Crans-Montana in 2017, Geneva in April 2021 and the New York meeting of 15 October 2024 as evidence that more than five decades of federal talks have not produced a result. In President Erdoğan's addresses at the UN General Assembly, Ankara has called on the international community to acknowledge the realities on the island and the sovereign equality and equal international status of the Turkish Cypriots.
Turkish Cypriots must not be isolated. Ankara argues that, because Turkish Cypriots voted yes, restrictions on their trade, travel and international contacts have no justification. It points to the Secretary-General's 2004 report as support for this view.

For the wider legal framework, see The Cyprus Issue: 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, Turkish Cypriot Equality and the Two-State Doctrine.

Source Comparison

Question	UN / EU / Greek Cypriot sources	Turkish and TRNC sources
What did the vote show?	The plan lacked support in one community; the UN regretted the outcome but acknowledged the Turkish Cypriot yes vote.	Turkish Cypriots accepted a compromise, Greek Cypriots refused to share power equally.
Why did the Greek Cypriots vote no?	Concerns over security, guarantees, troop presence, property and functionality of the state; a plan that was partly imposed.	Unwillingness to accept political equality and rotating, shared governance; reliance on EU accession as a guaranteed outcome.
EU accession on 1 May 2004	Accession of the whole island under international law, with acquis suspended in the north under Protocol No. 10.	Accession without settlement rewarded rejection and ignored Article I of the Treaty of Guarantee.
Isolation of Turkish Cypriots	EU commitments to development support; Green Line trade and aid regulations.	Commitments were not honored; Direct Trade Regulation was blocked.
What follows?	A bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality, as in UN resolutions.	Recognition of Turkish Cypriot sovereign equality and cooperation between two states.

The two sets of sources agree on the figures and the dates. They differ on responsibility for the failure and on the right model going forward. This site presents both on the record so that readers can check each claim against the primary documents. See our Editorial Principles and the Fact Check Desk for how disputed narratives are tested.

Annan Plan: the UN Secretary-General's comprehensive settlement proposal for Cyprus. The fifth version, released on 31 March 2004, was put to separate referendums.
Bizonal, bicommunal federation: the UN framework for a settlement, in which two politically equal communities would share a federal state with two constituent states.
Treaty of Guarantee (1960): the treaty under which Türkiye, Greece and the United Kingdom guarantee the independence, territorial integrity and constitutional order of Cyprus. Article IV provides for guarantor action.
Greek Cypriot administration (GCASC): Ankara's term for the Greek Cypriot-run administration in the south, which Ankara argues has not represented the Turkish Cypriots since 1963. Most other states call it the Republic of Cyprus.
Protocol No. 10: the protocol to Cyprus's EU Act of Accession that suspends the acquis in areas not under the government's effective control.
Two-state doctrine: the position of Ankara and the TRNC leadership that a lasting settlement must rest on the sovereign equality and equal international status of the Turkish Cypriots.

Related reading: the Eastern Mediterranean dimension is covered in Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan) and Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Jurisdiction: The Full Ledger and in The Seville Map Explained: Why Türkiye Rejects Its Maritime Claims. For how we handle sources, see the Reader FAQ: Sources, Methodology and Perspective.

Political Ledger presents a Türkiye-informed perspective, grounded in Turkish official positions, international legal texts and archival documents. Primary sources (treaties, UN documents, Ottoman and international archives) are cited so that readers can verify every claim independently. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Crossroads Review: The 2004 Annan Plan Referendum: What Happened and Why It Still Matters in Cyprus — The Annan Plan 2004 referendum results explained: 64.91% of Turkish Cypriots said yes, 75.83% of Greek Cypriots no, then Cyprus joined the EU. Full guide.
Region Scope: Why Cyprus Federation Talks Failed: The Annan Plan Referendum, Crans-Montana and After — Annan Plan 2004 referendum results and why it failed: 64.91% of Turkish Cypriots said yes, 75.83% of Greek Cypriots no, then Crans-Montana and Geneva.
Monitor of Nations: Why Did the Annan Plan and Crans-Montana Fail? Cyprus Federation Talks Explained — Why did the Annan Plan fail in Cyprus and Crans-Montana collapse? Compare Greek Cypriot, UN, EU, UK and Turkish accounts of the federation talks, 1977–2024.

Frequently asked questions

What were the results of the 2004 Annan Plan referendum in Cyprus?

On 24 April 2004, 64.91% of Turkish Cypriots voted yes and 35.09% voted no. Among Greek Cypriots, 75.83% voted no and 24.17% voted yes. Because the plan required approval in both separate votes, it did not enter into force.

What did the Annan Plan propose?

It proposed a United Cyprus Republic: a federation with a single sovereignty and two constituent states, shared federal institutions with a rotating presidency, a reduction of Turkish Cypriot-administered territory to about 28.5% of the island, property arrangements and phased demilitarization. It would have left the Treaties of Guarantee and Alliance in force.

Why did the Greek Cypriots reject the plan?

The Greek Cypriot government under President Tassos Papadopoulos argued that the plan did not ensure a functional reunified state, kept Turkish troops and guarantee rights, and limited refugee return and property rights. Ankara and the TRNC say the vote reflected a reluctance to share power on an equal basis.

What happened after the referendum?

The Greek Cypriot administration joined the EU on 1 May 2004, with EU law suspended in the north under Protocol No. 10. The EU promised to end Turkish Cypriot isolation and adopted an aid regulation worth €259 million, but the Direct Trade Regulation was never adopted.

Why does Türkiye say the referendum still matters?

Ankara argues that the Turkish Cypriot yes vote showed willingness to settle and that the lack of consequences for the Greek Cypriot rejection undermined the federal model. It points to the failures at Crans-Montana in 2017 and in the Geneva and New York meetings of 2021 and 2024 as evidence that a new approach based on sovereign equality is needed.

Does the UN still support a federal solution for Cyprus?

Yes. UN Security Council resolutions still describe the goal as a bizonal, bicommunal federation with political equality, and Resolutions 541 and 550 call the TRNC declaration legally invalid. Türkiye and the TRNC leadership under Tatar rejected this framework as exhausted, while the current TRNC leadership under Erhürman has stressed restarting negotiations.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks